ransomware hospital — both words
"data breach" — exact phrase
malware -android — exclude a word
(apple OR microsoft) patch — either company, plus patch
ransom* — a wildcard match
Searches article titles, summaries, keywords and sources. Filters use publication dates.
11–19 of 19 articles
Best match · title matches first
The Register
Houston, we have a PCspooF problem A vulnerability in a networking technology widely used in space and aircraft could, if successfully exploited, have disastrous effects on these critical systems including thwarting NASA missions, according to researchers.…
Dark Reading
Organizations looking to get ahead in cloud security have gone down the path of deploying CSPM tooling with good results. Still, there’s a clear picture that data security and security operations are next key areas of interest.
Dark Reading
New release also includes enterprise-grade cloud security posture management (CSPM) and YARA-based malware scanning capabilities.
The Hacker News
Businesses know they need to secure their client-side scripts. Content security policies (CSPs) are a great way to do that. But CSPs are cumbersome. One mistake and you have a potentially significant client-side security gap. Finding those gaps means long and tedious hours (or days) in manual code reviews through thousands of lines of script on your web applications. Automated content security
The Register
The whiff of rebellion among Cloud Solution Providers is getting stronger Microsoft has indefinitely postponed the date on which its Cloud Solution Providers (CSPs) will be required to sell software and services licences on new terms.…
Graham Cluley
Police in Tarragona, Spain, have arrested a man and a woman after they allegedly infected computers at high-street stores with malware with the intention of mining cryptocurrency on them. Read more in my article on the Hot for Security blog.
CISA advisories
View CSAF Summary Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to view transmitted data and use that data to log into the device. The following versions of InterSystems Corporation InterSystems IRIS for Health are affected: InterSystems IRIS for Health 2026.2.0.221, 2026.1.0.235, 2025.3.0.226 (CVE-2026-111594, CVE-2026-111594, CVE-2026-111594) CVSS Vendor Equipment v3 8.1 InterSystems Corporation InterSystems IRIS for Health 1 Vulnerability Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information Background Critical Infrastructure Sectors: Healthcare and Public Health Countries/Areas Deployed: Worldwide Company Headquarters Location: United States Vulnerabilities CVE-2026-111594 InterSystems IRIS for Health has TLS/SSL encryption turned off by default, which may enable an attacker to view transmitted data and use that data to log into the device. Read More 3 Affected Products InterSystems Corporation InterSystems IRIS for Health: 2026.2.0.221 Product Status: known_affected Remediations MitigationInterSystems recommends users configure IRIS superserver to require SSL/TLS: https://docs.intersystems.com/irislatest/csp/docbook/DocBook.UI.Page.cls?KEY=ROARS_gsecuring_checklist Note that there are three settings: "Disabled", which means that client communications do not use TLS. "Enabled", which means that client communications may use TLS (but they also may not) and "Required", which forces all client communications to use TLS. MitigationInterSystems documentation explains how to configure the server to require TLS: https://docs.intersystems.com/irislatest/csp/docbook/DocBook.UI.Page.cls?KEY=GSA_manage_superserver MitigationFor more information about how to configure a system to mitigate this vulnerability, contact InterSystems at their world wide response center: https://wrc.intersystems.com (login required) InterSystems Corporation InterSystems IRIS for Health: 2026.1.0.235 Product Status: known_affected Remediations MitigationInterSystems recommends users configure IRIS superserver to require SSL/TLS: https://docs.intersystems.com/irislatest/csp/docbook/DocBook.UI.Page.cls?KEY=ROARS_gsecuring_checklist Note that there are three settings: "Disabled", which means that client communications do not use TLS. "Enabled", which means that client communications may use TLS (but they also may not) and "Required", which forces all client communications to use TLS. MitigationInterSystems documentation explains how to configure the server to require TLS: https://docs.intersystems.com/irislatest/csp/docbook/DocBook.UI.Page.cls?KEY=GSA_manage_superserver MitigationFor more information about how to configure a system to mitigate this vulnerability, contact InterSystems at their world wide response center: https://wrc.intersystems.com (login required) InterSystems Corporation InterSystems IRIS for Health: 2025.3.0.226 Product Status: known_affected Remediations MitigationInterSystems recommends users configure IRIS superserver to require SSL/TLS: https://docs.intersystems.com/irislatest/csp/docbook/DocBook.UI.Page.cls?KEY=ROARS_gsecuring_checklist Note that there are three settings: "Disabled", which means that client communications do not use TLS. "Enabled", which means that client communications may use TLS (but they also may not) and "Required", which forces all client communications to use TLS. MitigationInterSystems documentation explains how to configure the server to require TLS: https://docs.intersystems.com/irislatest/csp/docbook/DocBook.UI.Page.cls?KEY=GSA_manage_superserver MitigationFor more information about how to configure a system to mitigate this vulnerability, contact InterSystems at their world wide response center: https://wrc.intersystems.com (login required) Additional Metrics Relevant CWE: CWE-319 Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information CVSS Version Base Score Base Severity Vector String 3.1 8.1 HIGH CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H 4.0 9.2 CRITICAL CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N View CVE Details Acknowledgments Abhinav Agarwal reported this vulnerability to CISA and InterSystems Corporation. Recommended Practices CISA recommends users take defensive measures to minimize the risk of exploitation of these vulnerabilities. Minimize network exposure for all control system devices and/or systems, ensuring they are not accessible from the internet. Locate control system networks and remote devices behind firewalls and isolating them from business networks. When remote access is required, use more secure methods, such as Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), recognizing VPNs may have vulnerabilities and should be updated to the most current version available. Also recognize VPN is only as secure as the connected devices. CISA reminds organizations to perform proper impact analysis and risk assessment prior to deploying defensive measures. CISA also provides a section for control systems security recommended practices on the ICS webpage on cisa.gov/ics. Several CISA products detailing cyber defense best practices are available for reading and download, including Improving Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity with Defense-in-Depth Strategies. CISA encourages organizations to implement recommended cybersecurity strategies for proactive defense of ICS assets. Additional mitigation guidance and recommended practices are publicly available on the ICS webpage at cisa.gov/ics in the technical information paper, ICS-TIP-12-146-01B--Targeted Cyber Intrusion Detection and Mitigation Strategies. Organizations observing suspected malicious activity should follow established internal procedures and report findings to CISA for tracking and correlation against other incidents. CISA also recommends users take the following measures to protect themselves from social engineering attacks: Do not click web links or open attachments in unsolicited email messages. Refer to Recognizing and Avoiding Email Scams for more information on avoiding email scams. Refer to Avoiding Social Engineering and Phishing Attacks for more information on social engineering attacks. No known public exploitation specifically targeting this vulnerability has been reported to CISA at this time. Revision History Initial Release Date: 2026-10-22 Date Revision Summary 2026-10-22 1 Initial Publication Legal Notice and Terms of Use
The Register
Your cloud security must stand alone As cloud adoption accelerates, many organizations are increasingly relying on the native security features offered by cloud service providers (CSPs). The ability to manage web application firewalls (WAF), data encryption, and key management (KMS) within a single provider ecosystem appears efficient and convenient. However, when security and reliability are viewed through the lens of enterprise risk management, this convenience may come at a significant cost.… Partner Content
The Hacker News
The threat actors linked to Kinsing have been observed attempting to exploit the recently disclosed Linux privilege escalation flaw called Looney Tunables as part of a "new experimental campaign" designed to breach cloud environments. "Intriguingly, the attacker is also broadening the horizons of their cloud-native attacks by extracting credentials from the Cloud Service Provider (CSP)," cloud