ransomware hospital — both words
"data breach" — exact phrase
malware -android — exclude a word
(apple OR microsoft) patch — either company, plus patch
ransom* — a wildcard match
Searches article titles, summaries, keywords and sources. Filters use publication dates.
1–10 of 12 articles
Best match · title matches first
The Register
One told to take down posts that said nice things about WP Engine Organisers of WordCamps, community-organized events for WordPress users, have been ordered to take down some social media posts and share their login credentials for social networks.…
The Register
Attack happened in 2023 using a bespoke backdoor, confirming year-old suspicions Dutch authorities are lifting the curtain on an attempted cyberattack last year at its Ministry of Defense (MoD), blaming Chinese state-sponsored attackers for the espionage-focused intrusion.…
The Register
Who knew 3 million actually means 700 in cybercrime forum lingo? D-Link has confirmed suspicions that it was successfully targeted by cyber criminals, but is talking down the scale of the impact.…
Dark Reading
As investigations continue, researchers find confirmation in their suspicions of a sprawling attack affecting multiple organizations.
The Hacker News
Lazarus, the prolific North Korean hacking group behind the cascading supply chain attack targeting 3CX, also breached two critical infrastructure organizations in the power and energy sector and two other businesses involved in financial trading using the trojanized X_TRADER application. The new findings, which come courtesy of Symantec's Threat Hunter Team, confirm earlier suspicions that the
Bleeping Computer
The Dutch police arrested a 39-year-old man on suspicions of laundering tens of millions of euros worth of cryptocurrency stolen in phishing attacks. [...]
The Register
Back to the future with short wave radio, plus Russia drop internet Iron Curtain Russia has reportedly blocked access to Western media outlets including the BBC to netizens within its borders, as suspicions rise that the country has begun implementing a "splinternet" plan to seal itself off from the wider internet.…
The Register
Suspicions about the integrity of Huawei products among US government officials can be attributed in part to a 2012 incident involving a Huawei software update that compromised the network of a major Australian telecom company with malicious code, according to a report published by Bloomberg. The snooping code reportedly deleted itself, but Australia's intelligence services decided China's intelligence services were responsible, "Having infiltrated the ranks of Huawei technicians who helped maintain the equipment and pushed the update to the telecom's systems." Australian intelligence is said to have shared details about the incident with American intelligence agencies, which subsequently identified a similar attack from China using Huawei hardware in the US. The report seeks to provide an evidentiary basis for efforts by the US and other governments to shun Huawei hardware amid global 5G network upgrades and to give that business to non-Chinese firms. The Register asked Huawei to comment and a spokesperson provided us with a copy of the remarks John Suffolk, Huawei's global cybersecurity officer, offered to Bloomberg. Yes, there was that dustup with its CFO, resolved to avoid a serious diplomatic row, the US government's trade secret theft lawsuit against Huawei based on T-Mobile's civil lawsuit, and claims that Huawei screwed over a California IT consultancy and backdoored a network in Pakistan. As far as the US is concerned, Huawei can't be trusted because the Chinese government could, in theory, make demands the company could not refuse. We can only imagine the cheer that went out among network switch vendors when the FCC announced it would pay US telecom providers to rip and replace their Huawei gear.
The Register
Suspicions about the integrity of Huawei products among US government officials can be attributed in part to a 2012 incident involving a Huawei software update that compromised the network of a major Australian telecom company with malicious code, according to a report published by Bloomberg. The snooping code reportedly deleted itself, but Australia's intelligence services decided China's intelligence services were responsible, "Having infiltrated the ranks of Huawei technicians who helped maintain the equipment and pushed the update to the telecom's systems." Australian intelligence is said to have shared details about the incident with American intelligence agencies, which subsequently identified a similar attack from China using Huawei hardware in the US. The report seeks to provide an evidentiary basis for efforts by the US and other governments to shun Huawei hardware amid global 5G network upgrades and to give that business to non-Chinese firms. The Register asked Huawei to comment and a spokesperson provided us with a copy of the remarks John Suffolk, Huawei's global cybersecurity officer, offered to Bloomberg. Yes, there was that dustup with its CFO, resolved to avoid a serious diplomatic row, the US government's trade secret theft lawsuit against Huawei based on T-Mobile's civil lawsuit, and claims that Huawei screwed over a California IT consultancy and backdoored a network in Pakistan. As far as the US is concerned, Huawei can't be trusted because the Chinese government could, in theory, make demands the company could not refuse. We can only imagine the cheer that went out among network switch vendors when the FCC announced it would pay US telecom providers to rip and replace their Huawei gear.
The Register
Suspicions about the integrity of Huawei products among US government officials can be attributed in part to a 2012 incident involving a Huawei software update that compromised the network of a major Australian telecom company with malicious code, according to a report published by Bloomberg. The snooping code reportedly deleted itself, but Australia's intelligence services decided China's intelligence services were responsible, "Having infiltrated the ranks of Huawei technicians who helped maintain the equipment and pushed the update to the telecom's systems." Australian intelligence is said to have shared details about the incident with American intelligence agencies, which subsequently identified a similar attack from China using Huawei hardware in the US. The report seeks to provide an evidentiary basis for efforts by the US and other governments to shun Huawei hardware amid global 5G network upgrades and to give that business to non-Chinese firms. The Register asked Huawei to comment and a spokesperson provided us with a copy of the remarks John Suffolk, Huawei's global cybersecurity officer, offered to Bloomberg. Yes, there was that dustup with its CFO, resolved to avoid a serious diplomatic row, the US government's trade secret theft lawsuit against Huawei based on T-Mobile's civil lawsuit, and claims that Huawei screwed over a California IT consultancy and backdoored a network in Pakistan. As far as the US is concerned, Huawei can't be trusted because the Chinese government could, in theory, make demands the company could not refuse. We can only imagine the cheer that went out among network switch vendors when the FCC announced it would pay US telecom providers to rip and replace their Huawei gear.